dc.contributor.author | Cáceres Quispe, Roxana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-16T16:49:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-16T16:49:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4611 | |
dc.description.abstract | La demanda en un primer momento fue declarado inadmisible, pero luego de
subsanar las observaciones fue admitida en vía procedimental abreviado,
posteriormente se emplazó al demandado quien contestó la demanda de manera
negativa, seguidamente se emitió el auto de saneamiento procesal por existir
una relación jurídica válida asimismo se fijaron los puntos controvertidos para
delimitar la Litis, también se admitieron los medios probatorios ofrecidas por las
partes a excepción de la exhibición sobre los recibos de pago de otro periodo
que debía exhibir la parte demandante, luego se llevó a cabo la audiencia de
pruebas para actuar la declaración de parte del demando y finalmente se emitió
la sentencia declarando fundada la demanda a favor del demandante, por tal
motivo el demandado dentro del plazo legal interpuso recurso impugnatorio de
apelación, se emitió la sentencia de vista en la que confirma la Resolución que
declaró fundada en primera instancia, siendo así que dentro del plazo
establecido por Ley, el demandado interpuso el recurso extraordinario de
casación, sin embargo no adjuntó el pago de la tasa judicial por concepto de
casación, es así que se le concedió tres días para acompañar la referida tasa, no
obstante pese a haber sido debidamente notificado y haber transcurrido en
exceso el plazo concedido para ello, el demando no cumplió, razón por la cual se
rechazó el recurso de casación y se le condenó a una multa de 10 URP, la cual
debía pagar dentro de los tres días de notificada la resolución. | es_PE |
dc.description.abstract | The present case, is a process referring to the obligation to give sum of money,
filed by representing (four brothers) against a natural person, requesting payment
of the sum of S /. 148,200.00 and $.154, 200.00 after the breach of payment by
lease contract and clauses established by both parties.
The demand at first was declared inadmissible, but after correcting the
observations was admitted in abbreviated procedural way, later it was summoned
to the defendant who answered the demand in a negative way, then the
procedural sanitation order was issued because there was a valid legal
relationship the controversial points were also established to delimit the Litis, the
evidential means offered by the parties were also admitted, with the exception of
the exhibition on the payment receipts of another period that the plaintiff was to
exhibit, then the evidence hearing was carried out to act on the declaration of the
defendant and finally the judgment was issued, stating the plaintiff's claim in favor
of the plaintiff, for this reason the defendant filed a writ of appeal within the
statutory period of appeal, the judgment verifying the Resolution was issued
which he declared founded in the first instance, being that Within the period
established by law, the defendant filed the extraordinary appeal, however, he did
not attach the payment of the judicial fee for the cassation, so he was granted
three days to accompany the aforementioned rate, despite having Once the
deadline for this has been duly notified and the time allowed for it has elapsed,
the claim was not complied with, which is why the appeal was rejected and he
was sentenced to a fine of 10 URP, which he had to pay within three days of
notified the resolution. | en_US |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_PE |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_PE |
dc.publisher | Universidad Andina del Cusco | es_PE |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es_PE |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | es_PE |
dc.subject | Contrato | es_PE |
dc.subject | Desnaturalización | es_PE |
dc.subject | Obligaciones de dar | es_PE |
dc.subject | Contrato de arrendamiento | es_PE |
dc.title | Trabajo académico expediente laboral: desnaturalización de contrato y expediente civil: obligación de dar suma de dinero | es_PE |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | es_PE |
thesis.degree.name | Abogado | es_PE |
thesis.degree.grantor | Universidad Andina del Cusco. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política | es_PE |
thesis.degree.discipline | Derecho | es_PE |
dc.publisher.country | PE | es_PE |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01 | es_PE |
renati.author.dni | 45921562 | |
renati.discipline | 421016 | es_PE |
renati.level | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/level#tituloProfesional | es_PE |
renati.type | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#trabajoAcademico | es_PE |